philosophizing few nights with some friends who currently have about forty years, showed that the phone has become a good mass of about 15-16 years. At the dawn of the future mobile prepaid, the use of mobile phones was exclusive to a few people, and it was like ostentatious status symbol. I remember clearly, through the eyes of a child, watching one of the first mobile phones, set in a briefcase briefcase. Today, however, the phone is held by at least nine out of ten people. Its convenience is undeniable, but, like all artifacts needs is a double edged sword. With the mobile phone today has lost the taste for adventure, perhaps associated with a healthy dose of unpredictability. One time, in fact, for example, if the motor was pulling the bucket a few miles away from home at night, there was no immediate help on your phone, you find some ingenious solution, thinking for themselves (the series " mo and I know your cock! "). Or a person could be tracked only if she were at home or at work. This is the real double-edged sword of the phone: traceability.
Just turning it on and be in a "blanket" to be able to identify the exact location of its user (currently, this power is reserved to the police).
the same level there is the availability voice 24/24, in very few moments breaks bales. (Now also visual, thanks to the cell. UMTS)
E 'on the traceability that has sparked the debate:
maybe the company, at the beginning of the " cellularisation " mass has made sure that most people used a mobile phone, to make them detectable, and charmed constantly? Subterfuge
studied table top or technological inevitable consequence?
(deliberately omit the economic concept).
0 comments:
Post a Comment